The blogging platform Medium and it’s copyright terms. Originally posted here on the Medium website. In case it gets pulled here it is in full.
this a Medium copyright briefing what’s the subtext?
I’ve not published here before. In a nutshell Medium is a blog aggregator with a super simple publishing interface for text stories with a giant photo banner at the head of the page.
Let’s have a look at their Ts & Cs and make sure they’re not grabbing your copyright like every other poorly advised Tom and Dick in the internet age.
So here’s what they say in their Terms of Service:
“  You own the rights to the content you post on Medium. We don’t claim ownership over any of it.  However, by posting or transferring content to Medium, you give us permission to use your content solely to do the things we need to do to provide Medium Services, including, without limitation, storing, displaying, reproducing, and distributing your content. This may include promoting your content with partner companies or services for broader broadcast, distribution, or publication. “
Sadly this is the most common all-rights grab out there.
 is standard default copyright, you own your copyright unless expressly assigned elsewhere in writing.
 the you own it but we can do anything we like with it clause. This is a rights grab: archive rights, repro rights and syndication rights.
In a nutshell they might not charge for this but their partner companies might, or use the content to generate ad revenue.
You can find the National Union of Journalist briefing on this here:
…bothered to post a Euro flyer through the door, so no 360 degree baloney detection for this election. However as a fledgling Google Glass user with an interest in deception and facial emotions this latest Glass product from Emotient could be a real eye-opener!
Although Google have said they won’t incorporate facial recognition features into Glass without strong privacy protections in place it surely must be a go-to piece of kit for those who can hit the privacy benchmark.
According to deception experts the Ekman Group: politicians, like actors, are a social group that we permit to lie to us. So with a new round of tribal politics let’s try some critical thinking. Let’s examine each leaflet/email/TV ad that arrives and give the contents a quick reality check and score it, let’s give it a cool media-friendly name from Carl Sagan, let’s call it the Bullshit Index. The BSI for short. Let’s start with the first pseudo-newspaper and the lead article that makes the Conservatives’ case for election.
Title: YOUR VOICE ~ Stop already. The assertion that any party is Your Voice is nonfactual and simply presumptuous. They may be representatives of the majority of voters at some time in the future that is all. BSI: 5/5.
Sub-head: A free newspaper sent to you by the conservative party at no expense to the taxpayer. ~ Due to the lack of transparency and the potential for corruption in the collecting of party funds it is debatable whether there will be an ‘expense’ or not. There is no cost of publication at point of sale.That bit is true. BSI: 3/5.
Article: Real Change in Europe By David Cameron
The European elections on Thursday May 22nd May are the most important for a generation. ~ Assertion of opinion, no reasons given why. It may or may not be true but no way to validate from this statement. Simple fear mongering. BSI: 5/5.
Britain’s relationship with the EU needs to change – and only the Conservatives can deliver that change. ~Assertion of opinion again with no qualifiers followed by unprovable claim. BSI: 5/5.
At home, the Conservatives’ long-term economic plan is working. The deficit is down and 1.5 million people are in work – that’s 1.5 million people with a job to provide for themselves and their families. ~ No source of data provided to fact check. If the 879,000 sanctions can be broken down further to distinguish who is/is not included in the figures it could make this claim very unreliable: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/stitching-up-claimants-part-job-says-3537051 Channel 4 show the long term figures are in the positive but there are questions over how people are categorized as employed/not employed and the willingness of all parties to cook the books on this set of stats.http://blogs.channel4.com/factcheck/unemployment-why-it-really-is-good-news/12810 ~This is an ongoing deception that could be easily cleared up. A quote from a report from Sheffield Hallam University clarifies the muddy waters:
“For Britain as a whole in April 2012, the new figures point to more than 3.4 million
unemployed. This compares to just 1.5 million on the claimant count and 2.5 million
according to the Labour Force Survey – the government’s two official measures of
unemployment. The difference is attributable to extensive hidden unemployment.”
Unlike other parties we don’t just talk about change – we deliver it. We vetoed an EU treaty that wasn’t in Britain’s national interest and cut the EU budget for the first time in history, saving British taxpayers over £8 billion. ~ It is in the nature of career politicians to instigate change for career purposes. Education is a clear example of overlaid legacy systems that do not necessarily provide the best return for pupils, teachers, schools or taxpayer across all administrations. Again assertions made without facts to backup are invalid. Cutting the EU budget claim for the good is a matter of opinion. The £8 billion saving is negated by the inefficiencies of the market system introduced to the NHS for example, an immediate annual £5 billion+ saving is an extremely conservative estimate just for admin costs let alone the usual wastage and commercial inefficiencies in the 10-30% range. http://chpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/At-what-cost-paying-the-price-for-the-market-in-the-English-NHS-by-Calum-Paton.pdf BSI: 5/5.
I’ve got some work to do and some righteous playing too. Last year I stopped being just a writer, see this post, and this year I’ve got some interesting things planned. Some will pan out, some won’t and either result is good. Usually the things that do pan out don’t always look the same as how you imagined them anyway, and often for the better. So here we go.
1. Be lucky.
Seize opportunities, expect all conversations to go well, reframe ‘didn’t happens’ as lucky escapes.
An expedition like this perhaps? Or maybe something altogether different…
2. Plan an expedition for 2015.
Already planning one with an ex team-GB pal. Just in prelim talks and going to test out logistics and kit in Feb, April or both.
3. Pitch TED prize.
I found a useful piece of economic data that could change the lives of millions. I intend to research and confirm it and if successful pitch it to TED. Add in a social media and website home as well. Nominations for the 2015 TED Prize will close at 11:59pm ET on Monday, March 31, 2014. If anyone would like to nominate me ahead of time feel free: http://www.ted.com/pages/prize_nominate
4. Develop business
I’ve identified an education business that’s ripe to be explored. So first order is test the market to see how robust it is. Define what the product will eventually look like. Then if confirmed buy kit and test it in the field with a local, national and international trial.
5. Be away from the desk.
Simple really, crack on with logging the walks for my mountain leader qualification. Get on a couple of trips.
6. Talk more.
I love the presenting/acting side of my work and I love meeting people. Nurturing and taking opportunities to do both should be seized often.
7. Write up my PHD proposal.
I had to put this off last year due to family commitments. This year I just need to get it done. Actually there are two research areas, so write both and see which feels ‘right’.
If it isn’t working, it’s a sunk cost. Either fix it or walk away.
Go back to number 1.
That’s it. This time in 2015, I’ll do the same again and see how I’ve progressed.